Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.tma.uz/xmlui/handle/1/1692
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhaitova G.D., Chorieva G.Z.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-26T17:01:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-26T17:01:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.tma.uz/xmlui/handle/1/1692-
dc.description.abstractFunctional methods of investigation (ultrasound and MRI) have high sensitivity in the diagnosis of placental in growth (sensitivity 78% and 84%, respectively). However, the isolated use of individual signs of these methods does not allow to reliably determine the depth of placental in vasion. The combined sensitivity of placenta accreta diag nosis is 61.5% for MRI and 62.5% for ultrasound, while the sensitivity of placenta increta diagnosis is higher for MRI 97.4% than for ultrasound 87.3%.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherO'zbekiston, Toshkenten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUDK;61.618-
dc.subjectplacenta previa, diagnostics, ultrasound, MRI.en_US
dc.titleA COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF PLACENTA PREVIAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
05. A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF PLACENTA PREVIA.pdfA COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF PLACENTA PREVIA7.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.